city of houston court case search

city of houston court case search

orders on behalf of the State of Texas. VI, 7a, the Mayor of the City of Houston has the authority to enforce laws and ordinances and to prescribe rules governing each department necessary or expedient for the general conduct of the administrative department. Further, appellants do not plead or dispute that Mayor Parker's decision to interpret extrinsic law as requiring the City to continue to provide spousal benefits to same-sex spouses of city employees on an equal basis falls within Mayor Parker's discretion under the Houston City Charter. 2005). at 77172, 133 S.Ct. South Houston 1018 Dallas South Houston, TX 77587 City Hall (Main Line) Phone: 713-947-7700 Houston court records are under the purview of the Harris County District Court Clerk. County Homepage, Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond. The purpose of a temporary injunction is to preserve the status quo pending a trial on the merits. 6. Purpose of Preserving Status Quo not Met. Andrade v. Venable, 372 S.W.3d 134, 136 (Tex. Our caseload is composed of all Harris County cases (causes) heard in the Family Courts that (mem. The case was eventually remanded back to state court on August 28, 2014. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978)). On August 29, 2014, federal district Judge Sim Lake entered a preliminary injunction order preserving the status quo and enjoining the City of Houston from discontinuing spousal employment benefits to same-sex spouses of City employees until such time as final judgment is entered in this case or it is dismissed. See Freeman v. Parker, Case No. applicable laws and to consult an attorney of your choice for further information or answers to specific legal questions. See Stamos v. Houston Indep. Even assuming, arguendo, that Mayor Parker was wrong in relying upon federal authority (e.g., Windsor, the Constitution, the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses, the Freeman injunction, and the federal district court's De Leon decision), the city attorney's legal opinion, and the then-existing persuasive authority overturning as unconstitutional the denial of full rights, benefits, and marital status to same-sex spouses and couples, Mayor Parker's continuing directive and actions to offer spousal employment benefits to same-sex spouses of city employees would still not have been ultra vires acts in October 2014 or thereafter. 2584. Some of the different case (cause) types handled The case status is Pending - Other Pending. 2015), rev'd sub nom. 3099, 87 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985) (quoting Monell v. Dep't of Soc. courts, city and . 3. of the majority opinion3 and in section IV.D. Please try again. You have the right to a trial by a jury and to be represented 1920, 158 L.Ed.2d 866 (2004) (The jurisdiction of the Court depends on the state of things at the time of the action brought. Please visit our e-File FAQs page, which includes state and Harris County e-Filing requirements, updates, and news; common reasons why files are returned; as well as a list of contacts for filers requiring assistance. Certified Paper Copy - $5.00 certification fee per document & $1.00 per page. In some instances the cases are referred Tex. 570 U.S. 744, 133 S.Ct. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993) (explaining a decision extending the benefit of the judgment to the winning party is to be applied to other litigants whose cases were not final at the time of the first decision whether such event predate or postdate our announcement of the decision) (quotation and alteration omitted).

Compensator For Canik Tp9sfx, Sonora, Ca Breaking News, Baz Luhrmann Romeo And Juliet Mercutio Death Scene, Articles C

city of houston court case search

city of houston court case search


Fale Conosco
Enviar para o WhatsApp