animal testing should be banned pros and cons

Advances in breast cancer, brain trauma, leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis and tuberculosis are directly attributable to animal experimentation, and without testing on chimpanzees, there would be no hepatitis B vaccine. One important advantage of animal testing is that we will be better able to understand certain viruses and bacteria once we test their effects on animals. According to the Humane Society International, animals are routinely force-fed, forced to inhale noxious compounds, deprived of food and water, physically restrained for prolonged periods, and burned; some of them reportedly even have their necks broken and are decapitated. Animal testing refers to the practice of performing unnatural and often painful experiments on animals held captive in stressful laboratory settings, often in the misguided belief that the results of the tests will be applicable to humans. In addition to the many reasons listed above, testing on animals is wasteful, violent, unproductive, and speciesist. The alternatives are the future. Sather Health is a student health website that aims to deliver trusted health information to students and their communities. Read the overview below to gain a balanced understanding of the issue and explore the previews of opinion articles that highlight many perspectives on animal testing. Students, read the entire article, then tell us: Do you support the decision by the E.P.A. Even worse are the experiments that kill the animals to understand death. This makes it possible for researchers to study the effects of treatments or genetic manipulation over a whole lifespan or even across several generations of mice. Animal testing is expensive, as one must pay for food, housing, and maintenance, as well as the initial cost of breeding/buying the animal. It's unethical to sentence 100 million thinking, feeling animals to life in a laboratory cage and intentionally cause them pain, loneliness, and fear. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-banner-1','ezslot_4',144,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-banner-1-0');This has not only been true in the past, but will continue to be true also in the future of humanity. Related article: Should testing on animals be banned? However, it is prudent and vital to consider the implications of such experiments, particularly in terms of the betterment of human lives. Animal testing refers to the practice of performing unnatural and often painful experiments on animals held captive in stressful laboratory settings, often in the misguided belief that the results of the tests will be applicable to humans. About 100 million animals take part in research every year. But its unlikely that animal experimentation would help their child much: other methods are likely more fruitful. In the past, there had been many diseases that led to the death of millions of people which can be treated much better today and some of those diseases had even ben eradicated over time. Experimenting on animals is not only cruel but also completely unnecessary and unethical. The provision would have banned research facilities from using any dog or cat that was . Studies published in prestigious medical journals have repeatedly shown that animal experimentation wastes precious resources and lives.

Property For Sale In Maxwell Texas, Toorak Abandoned Houses Address, Yorkshire Terrier For Sale In St Paul, Mn, Scorpio Career Horoscope Today, Kind Of Blue Mono Or Stereo Hoffman, Articles A